Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Jersey Shore Ruined Fist Pumps




Even though it's not especially useful, I maintain a blog. The name of it is a bit loony; it's called Fist Pumps and Beyond. I had no major qualms with the title until the emergence of Jersey Shore, when the act of fist-pumping became synonymous with vain dimwits who, for whatever reason, get paid to fry in tanning beds and drunkenly hump strangers in front of cameramen.

When I gripe about this little misfortune, I'm sometimes asked why I don't simply change the name of my blog. My response reflects that of Michael Bolton, the character from Office Space, when his co-worker urges him to alter his name so that he will be less readily linked to that Grammy-winner and “no-talent ass-clown,” the singer Michael Bolton.

“Why should I change?” I snap. “They're the ones who suck.”

Watching Jersey Shore is like a masturbatory salute to a massacre of brain-cells. That show is soft-core porn for women who prefer to watch a trollish and homely lead-actress. For men, Jersey Shore is the douche-bag's guide to success. It's a program designed for people who liked The Real World/ Road Rules Challenge, but demanded that it be dumbed down a couple notches.

My bitchiness on the issue notwithstanding, I have to concede that, at present time, those self-absorbed meat-heads serve a slightly greater purpose than I do. For the time being, their lives are probably more fulfilling than mine. Reality show playthings are held in higher regard than writers who accept bar credit as payment.

I get that. It's understandable. However, in the grand scheme of things, neither wealthy entertainers nor the malcontents struggling to entertain deserve to be valued too much. It shouldn't be overlooked that art, as well as reality TV—art's inbred and mutated distant-cousin—are luxuries rather than necessities. Humanity could easily survive without Jersey Shore or my blog. We could no doubt survive as a species in a world devoid of Pauly D. concerts, the plays of Shakespeare, the Super Bowl, The Godfather, reruns of Saved by the Bell, and cranky rants on the Internet...but we would prefer not to.

The pitiful burden of writers, actors, painters, musicians, and sure, even reality TV bottom-feeders, is the shared anticipation of money for performing non-essentials tasks. At its core, civilization does not require any form of entertainment to develop. Vocations such as inventor, doctor, nurse, teacher, scientist, cop, firefighter, architect, construction worker, electrician, mechanic, plumber, and garbageman have all benefited the human race vastly more than some greasy bum flexing his abs or some naysayer cracking jokes on his blog. Even professionals that are commonly loathed (dentists, lawyers, and politicians) offer a service more meaningful than entertainment. Artists and entertainers can rightfully look down on those whose ultimate goal is to follow their favorite jam band on-tour...but that about covers it; basically, people like me strive to become a wee bit more vital than filthy sponges of drugs and 6-minute guitar solos.

If that seems like an overstatement, consider the doomsday hypothetical. Humanity is relatively fortunate and spoiled at this stage of the time-line, but should the almighty reset-button be pressed on the game we have in progress, should our advancements be negated by some sort of Armageddon, what would be our top priorities when forced to rebuild a waylaid planet?

Putting together a performance of Our Town in a ruinous high school auditorium? Gathering around a campfire to indulge in an acoustic rendition of “The Times They Are A-changin'”? Trekking across a devastated landscape to New Jersey to ogle what's left of the freak-show by the shoreline?

If you care to survive in a post-apocalyptic world, it helps to answer those three questions with a series of “nopes.” A writer like me would almost certainly be screwed if society had to start over again.

If I had to choose one type of doomsday, it would have to be a zombie uprising. Even though it's the most unlikely scenario—much less plausible than scenarios caused by nuclear warfare, airborne viruses, and economic collapse—the zombie uprising is the funnest to consider, and the one that I have researched the most thoroughly by sitting on my ass while watching movies and TV shows and playing video games.

If we're overrun by the undead, the legit professionals that I mentioned before would all fare much better than the cast of Jersey Shore, but let's at least ponder the fates of the program's most recognizable morons—assuming they could endure the first few weeks of panic and destruction.

Pauly D. would soon feel the urge to throw a party for the survivors, but before that, he'd have to seek the services of an electrician in order to supply power for his turntables. And even if that electrician could provide a functioning current with extremely depleted resources for such a frivolous cause, the gaudy light-show and the thumping beats of Pauly D's concert would no doubt attract zombies to the gathering. Now, I hate to cheer for the undead, but if you're that dumb and negligent, you deserve to be the first of many victims in a zombie onslaught.

What happens to the rest of the useless human beings? Pay less than three bucks to find out. More Stories, and Additional Stories be the name of that eBook... Wait. Is, not be. Pirate jokes aren't as funny as more, especially when they're so egregiously out of context. Fuck! Well, buy the eBook, anyway.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Torture Porn Gets Two Severed Thumbs Down


Torture Porn is a thing now. It has been for awhile, actually, and our culture has accepted that. I had hoped it was but a morbid fad, but on the Torture Porn front, I had no such luck. Someday soon, "Torture Porn" could become a puzzle on Wheel of Fortune. It wouldn't be all that shocking. Two words, eleven letters, and the category is Thing.

Torture Porn is a genre of film known for its prolonged homicides and bleak outlook on life. The first installments of films such as Saw and Hostel combined to generate almost 200 million dollars at the box office, and both have spawned a number of lucrative sequels.

For entertainment purposes, I suppose, mankind has evolved to pair the notions of torture and porn—and with very successful results.

At some point, it seems, it was determined that both horror and skin-flicks had become tacky and old-fashioned.

The murders committed by the likes of Michael Myers and Jason must have been too sudden to thrive into the new millennium. An ice-pick thrust to the heart? A beheading with a machete? Sure, some horny coeds suffered grizzly deaths due to such heinous attacks, but those kinds of killings are done in ten seconds. What's going to fill the lengthy void between sprees of blood-lust? Characters? Plot? Suspense? Lame. Yawn. Booorrring!

Movie-goers demanded—or at least consented to—drawn-out, epic, and wholly excruciating murder scenes. No more of that quick savagery would suffice. The public longed for ten-minute murder scenes in which the victim was not only deprived of the fleeting hope of survival but also demeaned at great length and shown no mercy by a sadist intent on maximizing suffering.

In music terms, this is a bit like bidding good riddance to punk-rock homicides, which are swift and straightforward, and embracing jam-band homicides, which are protracted and prone to noodling. Like gushing hippies (minus the desire for peace), Saw and Hostel aficionodos no doubt exchanged glowing reviews in the wake of their theater experiences.

“Did you get a load of that three-minute sickle solo? That unrelenting shredding of limbs that avoided all major arteries? Massive blood loss, bro, but not enough to kill that helpless naked chick.”

“Agreed. Sickness personified, dude. And that snapping of the collar bone with a monkey-wrench? Crunchy. Bitch was crying all hysterical-like for so long before she finally croaked. So epic!”

I guess porn has become obsolete, too. Good-looking, well-endowed men and women having wild sex on camera? The formula became stale. Porn had to be enhanced...but how? Skimpier thongs? Faker boobs? More Kardashians? No, no, no! Such dull suggestions fail to satisfy the appetites of real 21st century wretches.

Thankfully, somewhere in Beverly Hills, a degenerate pondering the problem at length snapped his fingers with triumphant vigor. His once-weary eyes widened and brightened, for he had been struck by an epiphany.

“I've got it...Torture!” he exclaimed. “We must give porn that much-needed shot in the arm by adding torture! Torture Porn. Boo-ya!”

His idea flourished when put into practice, too. The Saw and Hostel series have jointly grossed nearly a billion dollars worldwide—and keep in mind, a billion dollars is more than a mere “shit-load of money.” A billion dollars marks the threshold of “a super shit-load of money.” Hell, these Torture Porns are on the verge of earning “a mega shit-load of money.” The Torture Porn pioneers could pool their fortunes to buy Greece if they felt like it.

People are making what may soon qualify as a mega shit-load of money by showing people being tortured by people to many, many people across the globe--and that is both depressing and disgusting.

Torture and porn don't belong together. They're ill-matched, like lard and chocolate. Some couples actually get off on Torture Porn. It's repulsive. Imagine the conversations they have.

“Honey, did you get a chance to watch that Saw 13 DVD I ordered from NetFlix?”

“Sure did. Oh, that Torture Porn took my breath away.”

“You said it, Maude. That half-hour lawn-dart massacre? Mmm. Since the children have gone to bed, let me be candid with you: That got me rock hard.”

“Yup! Why, I felt so hot and tingly not long after the opening credits, and that skull-drilling to the brain just about made me want to burst.”

"Indeed. I decided to rub one out at that point in the film.”

“George, you devil! Oh, make love to me, cuddle-bunny.”

End twisted scene.

Now, I'll get to the torture half of this vile pairing later, and be concise about it. As for porn, I will concede that it sometimes degrades women, glorifies sleeping around with just about anyone, and tends to present a certain body-type that other women cannot and should not feel that they have to compete with in order to attract her ideal man. That's true.

On the other hand, to most men, beautiful naked women are pretty much the greatest sight to behold on this planet, immensely pleasing to the body and mind, unsurpassed in beauty by a sunset at the Grand Canyon or a lunar eclipse or whatever inferior fluff you care to compare beautiful naked women to. Admittedly, plan-A is to find one to date and perhaps even marry. Plan-B is porn, though, and strangely enough, guys with thriving plan-A's still resort regularly to plan-B. Porn exists in part because nothing carries as much artistic power as a beautiful naked woman does--and even guys who dismiss that assessment as pretentious bullshit aren't likely to deny that chicks are just so damn hot.

And that's my ambivalent defense of porn.

As for torture, well...torture sucks. If you want to kill someone, be quick about it. Only sadists drag it out. To hell with sadists. They're horrible, subhuman creatures.

I'm a fair-weather fan of Team Jesus, too, and I hate the notion of watching that swell guy get tortured so much that I have never bothered to watch The Passion of the Christ.

I'm OK with my preference of regular porn over Torture Porn. It's natural to have a libido, but the same is not true about craving depictions of the worst kind of human suffering conceivable.

Torture Porn is a heaping, mega-load of morally toxic bullshit.

Hostel Schmostel.

You want a catchier conclusion?!

Don't see Saw; Saw sucks.

Meh. Good enough. And I'll try to come up with some pejorative words that rhyme with Human Centipede in time for part five.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Cubs Fan's Plea to Nephew




My nephew was born on the eleventh of January, a time when baseball diamonds across Wisconsin were dormant and buried in snow, hibernating and hardly expectant of fresh grass and prolonged daylight anytime soon. In addition to my sister-in-law and nephew, my mom had a room at the same hospital. She was recovering from a stroke, dutifully reviving her speech and half her body. My family took it as a quirky boon that she required only an elevator and a husbandly chauffeur to wheel her down one floor to see her first grandchild.

Kaden made his grand entrance in fine health, caterwauling hello-greetings loud enough to rouse three inpatients from their comas, and as my mom convalesced, my family rebuffed the daunts and dolors of winter with months of gratitude and relief—not to mention Mickey Mouse-falsetto coos addressed to the newest member of the clan.

Eventually, conflicts resumed, as they always do, but at least the conflict in question was merely a competitive farce. Rather than focus on their mutual love of baseball—their shared awareness of the timelessness, mystique, and gut-wrenching drama of the game—my brother and his wife have instead opted to concentrate on the bothersome fact that they cheer for different teams. (Such a folly is not unique to my brother and his wife, of course.) While she favors our home-state's Milwaukee Brewers, he is a Cubs fan.

A friendly struggle commenced for the boy's baseball team allegiance. Owing to his mother's superior knack for fashion and the 2011 Brewers' dominance in the standings, Kaden was fitted with Crew apparel more regularly than Cubs clothing. (In a gesture of diplomacy, he was, at least, dressed in a Cubs shirt for the Christmas card I received.)

With the Cubs hunkered down in rebuilding mode for at least a season and the Brewers—notwithstanding the likely departure of Prince Fielder and the sore subject of Ryan Braun's suspension—poised to make another playoff run, mom's team looks poised to take a two-to-nothing lead in the series.

That is strictly where wins are concerned, however, and my humble plea to my nephew to support the league's best team in 1908 runs deeper than that.

For starters, there is something petty and feckless about those who, as Bob Dylan put it, “Just want to be on the side that's winning.” True sports fans back their teams in sickness and in health—or in the case of the Cubs, in sickness and in worse sickness. Furthermore, in my estimation, those who strictly root for teams in their home state display both a dire lack of creativity as well as a cowardly instinct to never stray from the herd. Staunch homers are but feeble conformists, and I'd prefer that my nephew feel undaunted by the prospect of being different.

Besides, it's always a mischievous thrill to bear the brunt of criticism from home-state purists too daft to realize how silly it is bicker about free will as it pertains to something as (awesome yet) relatively unimportant as baseball.

Someday I'd love to see my nephew applaud game-winning RBIs in the bottom of the ninth at Wrigley. After all, Cubs-devotion teaches us that a sense of humor and hope are our two most vital attributes when life has us mired in a slump.

I want to tell Kaden about the seventh-inning stretches emceed by a half-tipsy Harry Caray, in the midst of all the late-game deficits, his hearty cries to “score some runs” that, more often than not, went unfulfilled. I want to tell him that one of the funniest men alive, the droll goof-ball from Ghostbusters and Groundhog Day, roots for the Cubs, too. I want to tell him about silly superstitions, the curse of the billy-goat and the poor fan who was scorned for trying to catch a foul-ball, the tragicomedies that ensued and the lessons we can learn from them. And when he's old enough, I want to show him the comedy of errors that is Curb Your Enthusiasm and ask him to consider the parallels between Larry David's life of follies and the plight of the Cubs.

I want him to know that neither life nor the Cubs ever get so dismal that we can't laugh for some reprieve.

In addition to the appeal of laughter, I'd encourage him to extol the Cubs because they coax us to hope against all odds. Skeptics cackle when we assure each other to wait until next year, and with good reason, probably, but they don't understand that hope is a sacred thing to us—as it should be for everyone, regardless of which baseball team, if any, one chooses to endorse. They can call us fools if they wish, but we will force them to acknowledge that we are, at least, fools who never give up.

In my plea, I will relay to Kaden that his grandmother laid weakened on a hospital bed in the E.R. before she was flown on Flight for Life to Milwaukee, that he was still in his mom's tummy when grandma Ruth promised her daughter-in-law and the rest of us that she'd be here for the boy's birth, and that the family had to leave the room a moment later when the EMTs arrived and secured her to a gurney.

She kept her promise and revels adoringly in babysitting duties and holiday visits as I type this. But my nephew should keep in mind that, in the time between stops at hospitals 66 miles apart, our family had no proof that she'd live to see her first grandchild. One of life's misfortunes had made us uncertain and powerless.

I will inform him of these happenings and then conclude my plea to him concerning the Cubs by telling him about the only thing working in his family's favor during that difficult time.

“All we had was hope, kid, but somehow, that was enough.”

Sunday, January 15, 2012

The Hindsight Awards





As an outrageous footnote to the horrid scandal of Jerry Sandusky—the former Penn St. defensive coach accused of sexual abuse by at least ten young men—it should be mentioned that in 2001, the man published an autobiography titled, Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story. This means that, creepily enough, one can browse through a Barnes & Noble store or Amazon.com and happen upon a book designated as “Touched by Jerry Sandusky.”

His book concludes with the following sentiment: “...I hope I can add a little touch to others' lives...” The alleged pedophile seemingly intended his title and parting words to reflect the hopes of a noble philanthropist, but a decade later, his literary work serves as rotten and damning evidence against his claim of innocence.

Now, to be clear: I do not think a transgression as heinous and depraved as child-molestation is funny by nature. I do, however, have a fondness for irony, especially the sort of irony that (however belatedly) gives a doomed lowlife his comeuppance. Furthermore, I recognize that tragicomedy exists, even when the ratio of tragedy to comedy is about 99.9% to .1%.

To elaborate some on that .1%, then, I have to offer a rough sketch of a ceremony I think the general public should hold on an annual basis. The event would acknowledge the awful happenings from the past that were unknown but now seem dreadfully obvious. And since the disgrace in question relates to athletics, it's only fitting that two sports-announcers should host this segment:


The Hindsight Awards

Clutching microphones, broadcasters Al Michaels and Bob Costas sit behind a desk. Behind them, spectators abuzz with anticipation fill out a vast auditorium. Spotlights flicker across the expansive stage pictured in the background.

Al Michaels: Hello and welcome to this year's Hindsight Awards—recognizing the horrible things we should have seen coming but somehow didn't. It's been a prolific year for hindsight, hasn't it, Bob?

Bob Costas: You said it, Al. So many travesties in sports that should have been put to a halt years ago but sadly weren't. The hindsight judges have singled out the three worst offenders, though, and presently, the favorite will be Touched by Jerry Sandusky.

Al Michaels: Or perhaps Bernie Fine.

Bob Costas: Yes, quite the tragedy in its own right. Hindsight voters can't overlook the grim truth that Syracuse basketball was, for years, the only program that traveled its ball boy to games on the road.

Al Michaels: To satisfy the depraved lust of an allegedly lecherous coach. Chilling.

Bob Costas: Yes. Chilling and painfully obvious, looking back. But let's not forget about the third nominee for this year's award, defending champ O.J. Simpson.

Al Michaels: Author of If I Did It, a proposal outlining the ways in which O.J. would have gone about killing his ex-wife and her lover had he actually been guilty of the crime.

Bob Costas: Which he most certainly was.

Al Michaels: In hindsight, yes, Bob—that's exactly right. Along with our other nominees, O.J. has been sequestered in a heavily guarded dressing room for tonight's festivities.

Bob Costas: Truly, a hellish den of unrepentant sinners. What are your thoughts on the front-runner for this year's Hindsighty?

Al Michaels: O.J. is still a force to be reckoned with, but it can't be overstated that for two long and intense weeks, the front-runner has been Touched by Jerry Sandusky.

Bob Costas: And Barney Fine?

Al Michaels: He's a worthy nominee, but let's be clear: Sandusky has the edge over Fine where allegations are concerned. The State of New York's statute of limitations on charges of pedophilia provides a comparatively restricted window of time for its devastated accusers--which is bad news for Hindsighty hopeful Bernie Fine.

Bob Costas: What a repulsive thing to keep in mind. Now, for the bettors in our viewing audience, let's send it to Joe Buck, live from Las Vegas.

Inside a tense betting room, anxious gamblers huddle in front of TV sets behind Joe Buck.

Joe Buck: Here in Vegas, the prevailing sentiment seems to be that double-murder, and years later, assault with a deadly weapon may be even worse than perversely touching a child. That means the odds have once again tilted in O.J.'s favor. Right now, insiders believe that the underdog is going to be Touched by Jerry Sandusky. Back to you, Bob.

Coverage returns to Costas and Michaels.

Bob Costas: Wow. I did not see that coming.

Al Michaels: How apropos.

The two indulge in a fit of jovial laughter punctuated by knee-slapping.

Behind the two, a lanky figure dressed in a tuxedo approaches the podium.
Bob Costas: With no further analysis, then, we take you to Cris Collinsworth for the unveiling of this year's Hindsighty.

Self-assured and proudly postured, a dapper Cris Collinsworth addresses the audience. He taps an envelope against the podium and begins his speech.

Cris Collinsworth: Not since almost winning a Super Bowl have I been bestowed with such a remarkable yet appalling honor. Google's Synonym-Finder cites “retrospect” as another term for “hindsight,” and since I don't know what that word word means, either, I asked my son, who gave me a rough definition that I could wrap my brain around. (He chuckles.) Now, the votes have already been counted, but I have to confess that I'm biased. You see, my son is a full-on, Touched by Jerry Sandusky supporter.

The camera-view switches to show Costas and Michaels slapping hands against faces and shaking heads in bewildered unison.

Cris Collinsworth: (Still chuckling.) He wants it to be Touched by Jerry Sandusky in the worst way, but we'll see about that. OK. Now, let's find out this year's Hindsighty winner in sports. The nominees are Touched by Jerry Sandusky...And Bernie Fine...And last but certainly not least, the reigning champ, O.J. Simpson!

Everyone in the arena applauds while booing. Collinsworth opens the envelope in his hand.

Cris Collinsworth: And the winner is...Touched by Jerry Sandusky! Let's go to the dressing room of the nominees, where an armed police officer is poised to give that awful degenerate his award.

Grinning boyishly, equipped with a statuette and a shotgun, a cop waves hello. He nudges the door open to the dressing room, only to recoil and gasp. He shakes his head dismally, shuts the door in slow increments, and signs the beheading hand-gesture to the camera.

On-set, Costas and Michaels are shown, both intently pressing their earpieces as they receive new information from the producers.

Al Michaels: Good God. I don't believe it. Folks, in a sick and bizarre twist at this year's ceremonies, we have reports that both Sandusky and Fine have been found dead in the dressing room they shared with O.J. Simpson.

Bob Costas: Yes. They're apparent victims of self-strangulation.

Al Michaels: Sickening. Let's throw it to former NBC commentator O.J. Simpson for his analysis. Juice?

Swarmed by gun-toting cops and clad in orange prison garb, O.J. grips a microphone outside the scene of the crime. Sweat drips from his forehead but he manages a warm smile.

O.J. Simpson: Thanks, Al. And congratulations to the deceased. Now, I just want to make one thing clear: I don't know who or what killed those two men...but I'm determined to write a book on the mystery, titled If I Killed Jerry Sandusky and Bernie Fine, Here's How I'd Do It. I'll see you at next year's Hindsightys, guys!

The view returns to Michaels and Costas, both tickled and awestruck. Michaels shrugs deliberately.

Al Michaels: That's our O.J.!

Bob Costas: Such a rascal.

Monday, January 9, 2012

Ueck Tribute



I was asked the following question by a piece of paper that I printed from my computer.

Tell us (The MLB Fan Cave) which MLB star you want to meet most, why, and describe the video idea you would want to film with this player.

Here is my response.

The MLB star I'd most like to meet is not an active player. In the '60s, he earned some scratch as a backup catcher in the show, but his career stats are, by his own admission, downright laughable. Don't hold that against him, though, because in the grand scheme of things, being laughable was and remains the supreme intent of Bob Uecker.

In regard to his stand-up comedy endeavors, Uecker stated, “I just recited the highlights of my career and the audience thought it was hilarious.” With dry and mordant self-deprecation, the Brewers' radioman has a knack for transforming failure into redemption and bliss. Like most every great humorist (baseball or otherwise), Uecker's mockery extends from internal to external. He endears audiences with his humility and his value of truth over ego before demonstrating that we're all part of the immense, cosmic joke--and therefore subject to ridicule. Uecker reminds us that to err is human, but more importantly, that the follies encoded in our beings are the source of hilarious material.

Perhaps my favorite Uecker quip was delivered on Milwaukee's WTMJ wavelength last season. Puzzled by the surge of “Tony Plush” t-shirts and signs around Miller Park, Uecker asked his co-announcer Cory Provus for an explanation of the trend. Provus dutifully informed him that Tony Plush is the alias of Nyjer Morgan, the Brewers' feisty and eccentric center-fielder. Ueck (aka Mr. Baseball) vaguely understood, but seemed nonplussed. Provus followed up with an inquiry of which name the voice of the Crew would choose as his alter-ego. With the swiftness of a Nolan Ryan fastball, Uecker replied, “Betty Davis.” And for the ensuing 30 seconds, the only soul dialed in to the broadcast who refrained from busting a gut was Bob Uecker.

As a mid-essay plot-twist, I'm not a Brewers fan. Since kindergarten, I have lent my support to the lovable losers due south of Wisconsin, the Chicago Cubs. (For some odd reason, I gush over excellence in comedy more so than in baseball.) I mention that because, should I be fortunate enough to shoot a promo alongside of Ueck, my Cubbie-allegiance could be brought up and lampooned.

What follows is a rough outline of my exchange with Bob Uecker.

Bob: So, this year's Fan Cave guy is a Cubs fan from Wisconsin. What's the story?

Nick: Relax, Ueck. It all boils down to freedom of choice.

Bob: Benedict Arnold said the same thing. That's some philosophy, kid.

Nick: Hey, come on. I seem to remember you calling games for the Cleveland Indians years ago.

Bob: Oh, not this again...

Nick: Hear me out. This year's Cubbies could be a lot like that Tribe team from the early '90s. We've got a roster full of misfits and under-achievers, low expectations, and an unproven rookie manager.

Bob: If I have to explain to yet another yahoo that that movie was not based on a true story...

Nick: Both Cerrano and Soriano are Dominican-born outfielders who can mash fastballs, yet struggle to hit the off-speed stuff. Cerrano, Soriano—the names sound eerily similar. Connect the dots, Ueck. I think the Cubbies are bound for the World Series.

Bob: That Indians team got swept in the ALCS! Didn't you ever see the sequel?! (Shakes head in dismay.) Moron.

End scene.

I'd be honored to be called a moron by Bob Uecker.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

The Mario 2 Outlook






I hope I didn't lose you with that title—and by and large, I am addressing women. Admittedly, this essay does in fact discuss video games, but my intent is not to bore you with bluster about Blaster Master or Bionic Commando or some other garage-sale relic that means nothing to you. For good or ill, the fact remains that if you were born after 1970, video games were a part of your upbringing. And like it or not, a select few Nintendo titles have become iconic in our culture, and nothing short of a genocide waged against nerds like me is going to erase that.

The three Super Mario Bros. games, for instance, transcend obscure and geeky limitations. If someone were to show you a picture of Super Mario and ask you to name him, failing to do so does not mean that you're remarkably refined and mature. It means that you're probably Amish.

So, allow me to reverse my tactics from defensive to offensive. If you're unwilling to accept that Super Mario has made a mark on our culture, if it seems silly to construe deeper meanings from something that is so widespread and familiar to us, then by all means, don't read another word and find something better to do. Somewhere, no doubt, there is a barn that needs to be raised and butter that is not going to churn itself.

Now that we're off and running: It is vastly accepted by people of my ilk that Super Mario Bros. 3 is the finest of the trio in question. (Regardless of whether or not you care to know, 3 has been voted the absolute greatest Nintendo game by numerous websites devoted to critiques of interactive button-mashers.) The original Super Mario—the one bundled along with Duck Hunt and a Nintendo system that enthralled so many children of the '80s on Christmas mornings—is commonly rewarded the silver medal. The guiding force of this essay, Super Mario Bros. 2, is still considered very good by critics, yet by no means a match for its odd-numbered counterparts.

But 2 is the true standout in my opinion that is due for a humbling any day now. Let me tell you why.

Saluting 2 is a fine way to buck conventional thought. If we concede that dimwits outnumber sages on this planet—and that one of the downfalls of the consensus is that its masses are more prone to human error—then it's not at all absurd to recognize 2 as Mario's premier 8-bit adventure. Now, if you still consider 2 the runty black sheep of the litter, that doesn't mean you're part of a consensus dumber than the Earth-is-flat believers of centuries past, nor wickeder than the generations of Americans who had no big qualms with slavery. All I'm trying to convey is that the majority have been known to embrace faulty convictions.

2 is distinct and versatile. There are four characters to choose from with unique strengths and weaknesses. Whereas the first and third games are, at best, partnerships, 2 has to offer a full-fledged democracy. In 1 and 3, Mario & Luigi represent Simon & Garfunkel in that it's clear who meant more to the duo and therefore had richer success in his solo career. 2, by contrast, has to offer a quartet that is as dynamic as the Beatles.

Just like Paul, Mario is an affable and steadfast front-man, a consummate leader. With his wild and eccentric leaps of creativity (and jealousy of Paul/ Mario's prestige), John functions as Luigi. George is like Peach; both can levitate with meditative Zen. Toad has the beefy build of a drummer, and much like Ringo, his contribution to the group is indelible, but you'd never want to buy one of his solo projects.

You're still free to favor the odd-numbered Marios, of course, but be warned: doing so may lead to debates with nut-bars who will counter that that's like saying Simon and Garfunkel are better than the Beatles.

Holy fuck, Shakespeare probably realizes he was a chump by now if indeed dead souls have conscious thoughts! More Stories, and Additional Stories is the name of that eBook.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Sean Connery Will Survive




My friend had his tuft of black locks pulled and bobbed in the back. I thought his hairdo made him resemble Steven Seagal, and as he sought the bartender's attention, I nudged him and told him so. He grinned and took no offense and that was the intent. In no time he got me to agree that the Seagal-look was at least better than having a receding hairline. We took a minute out of our night to discuss Seagal-classics like Undersiege and Marked for Death. That alloted minute extended when we couldn't recall the name of the action flick in which Seagal dies within the first twenty minutes. We remembered that it took place on an airplane that had been hijacked by terrorists, and while an American special forces unit covertly boards the plane to rescue the passengers, some sort of a mechanical mishap spells death for Seagal's character. From the thin air of the stratosphere, he plunges to the ground. We're left to imagine the gruesome impact of his body going splat and then the movie—whatever it's called—goes on without him.

The next morning, when I logged on to the Internet to get the answer, three things occurred to me. 1.) The movie is Executive Decision. 2.) Although this film was received fairly well by audiences and critics, it Marked for Death the clout of Seagal as a lead-actor in action flicks. The year after ED hit theaters, 1997, saw the release of Fire Down Below, and by then, it became pretty clear that Seagal had devolved into a farce. In the following decade, most of his action flicks were shipped straight to rental racks. Then Seagal decided he was tired of pretending and wanted to kick some ass for real. Decades after he graduated from police academy, Seagal became a Reserve Deputy Chief in Louisiana. As of late 2008, a camera crew has followed him around on the job because it would be wasteful for Seagal to tackle and shackle a meth-cook without broadcasting his heroics. 3.) I can think of one actor who can't at all relate to Seagal's plight; his career was never marred by an ignoble death on-screen. His premier roles signify more about survival and death than any other actor. His name is Sean Connery.

As the original James Bond, Connery set the mold for action heroes who defy death against all odds in a flurry of punches, bullets, explosions, and charisma. Most of the actors who followed in Connery as Bond's wake emphasized the first three parts of the action-movie equation in order to compensate for their lack of charisma. Connery as Bond didn't have that problem. Arnold outlasted the Predator because he was the strongest one in his squad. Neo killed dozens of digital-henchmen because he had an unlimited supply of guns and ammo. John McLean prevailed in Die Hard 2 because in the end he (cleverly) blew up the bad guys' plane. James Bond is different. Punches, bullets, and explosions are constant in Bond flicks, but somehow they are marginalized. It's more engaging to time how long it takes Bond to bed his next vixen and then guess which sexual innuendo he'll quip afterward. Bond employs fisticuffs, guns, and gadgets to survive, but the primary reason why he seems so impossible to kill is because he's such a ruthless charmer.

In Casino Royale, Ian Fleming's first novel in the Bond series, the author describes 007 as the spy nods off for the night on a hotel bed.

“...With the warmth and humour of his eyes extinguished, his features relapsed into a taciturn mask, ironical, brutal, and cold.”

Fleming hints that—beneath a veneer of good manners and chivalry—chilled irony is one of Bond's core, unconscious traits. Bond is wont to express the opposite of what he means in his actions and speech. That is why, in Goldfinger, for instance, he seems smooth rather than silly while he swims toward the shore of the harbor of a bad-guy stronghold with a fake-duck helmet strapped to his head. It's a farcical trick that is more befitting of Inspector Clouseau, and yet Bond lends the impression of a shrewd expert because of his capacity for irony. Later on, in the calamitous wake of the detonation of the bomb that he plants to combat evil forces, Connery as Bond gallivants into the dressing room of the belly-dancer in a nearby tavern. They smooch, of course, but when she objects to the presence of a pistol carried in his shoulder-strap, Bond mock-apologetically says, “I have a slight inferiority complex.” (Even though he clearly doesn't.) Obligingly, he sets the holstered gun aside to allow further kissing. Facing the bathtub that his latest lust-interest emerged from, Bond has his back turned to an advancing henchman armed with a club. A trusting and romantic lover would likely keep his eyes shut during this stage of foreplay; Bond, however, opens his lids to gaze warily into the eyes of the belly-dancer. He detects the ghostly glimmer of the advancing henchmen in her deceitful peepers, and whirls her around so that the club crashes down on the back of her skull. Following a prolonged tussle, Bond launches his attacker into the filled bathtub. He then swipes a plugged-in fan into the porcelain pond and electrocutes the man. As the treacherous woman rubs her swollen head, Bond readies his escape, but not before he quips, “Shocking. Positively shocking.”

Only, he wasn't really shocked by the belly-dancer's treachery. Casino Royale is rare in that Bond doesn't kill a soul nor bed a woman until his tale of genesis is almost finished. More surprising still, he tells his main squeeze--a fellow spy with stunning curves and dark secrets—that he intends to marry her. The woman, named Vesper Lind, panics, balks, makes love to him, and begs to study his face intently before he retires to his own quarters. He finds her dead the next morning, having overdosed on sleeping pills. Her suicide note reads...

“...This is the last moment that your love will last...I am a double agent for the Russians.”

Vesper was blackmailed into deceit by SMERSH, a cutthroat counter-intelligence group founded by Stalin, but nevertheless, the gash in Bond's heart has never mended. “He saw her now only as a spy,” Fleming writes. When Bond phones London to inform his bureau he tartly reports: “(Vesper) was a double, working for Redland...Yes, dammit, I said was. The bitch is dead now.”

Although Casino Royale wasn't adapted into a film until long after Connery's tenure as Bond had run its course, the novel must have been vital to Connery's understanding of 007. Accordingly, his brisk and bold seduction of Goldfinger's gorgeous accomplice Jill gets her killed and coated from bare head-to-toe in gold paint, but Bond never sheds a tear. Later in the film, Oddjob slays Jill's vengeful twin sister with a long-distance toss of his deadly bowler hat, but Bond doesn't waste a minute of screen-time mourning. After that, a rollicking match of Judo-foreplay in a barn begets a roll in the hay with Pussy Galore—another lackey of Goldfinger's whom Bond bangs in spite of (or because of) her cold and brutal disposition. Much of You Only Live Twice takes place in Japan. In addition to confirming another skill of survival, Bond's Christlike power of resurrection, the hero charms and seduces a Japanese ally named Aki. While the two slumber in bed one night, a ninja-assassin poisons and kills her. Again, Bond hardly mourns; the next day, he graduates from ninja academy and—rather than attend Aki's funeral—he weds a different Japanese stunner, Kissy, in a mock-ceremony to (somehow...the plot gets a bit silly) increase his inconspicuous cover and further his mission to thwart the evil Ernst Stavro Blofeld. Aki's murder barely causes a murmur in the plot-line. Upon completion of his mission, just give Bond an exotic siren to ravish on a life-raft or underneath a parachute (Aki, Kissy, Pussy, the busty blond from Dr. No—who cares?) and he's a happy Double-O agent...a happy Double-O agent with a boner.

Bond's aversion to long-term relationships explains why his constant flirting with Miss Moneypenny has never led to intercourse. To Bond, the problem with Moneypenny—secretary to M, his superior—is that she would make the perfect wife. He trusts and admires her. The two believe in and fight for the same global causes. Her wit is a worthy match for his own and she is much smarter than the typical bimbos in Bond's Rolodex. Unfortunately, Bond will have to wait until his retirement to propose to Moneypenny. In the following passage, Fleming explains his protagonist's feelings on love and luck.

“One day, and he accepted the fact, he would be brought to his knees by love or by luck. When that happened he knew that he too would be branded with...the acceptance of fallibility.”

The Bond/ Moneypenny union would equate to 007's surrender to death—and he won't risk that as long as vermin like Dr. No and Goldfinger infect the planet. In the Bond films he starred in, Connery doesn't survive because of love; he survives because he transcends a reliance on love that is far too human and fragile.

###

Connery's survival in The Hunt for Red October is simpler to assess. As Captain Marko Ramius, a Lithuanian-born refugee to Russia, Connery plots to exploit his command of the Soviets' prized, top-secret submarine for his own benefit. The Red October's stealth is unmatched. The vessel can't be detected by sonar and it is stocked with nuclear missiles. The captain's intent, however, is not to incinerate Manhattan and incite a toxic heat-wave on the Cold War-front. Instead, he plans to surrender the sub to the U.S., as a gift to declare his defection.

Before the completion of this traitorous deal, the bare hands of Connery as Ramius snuff the life out of a political officer (and loyal Soviet) on the cusp of foiling his scheme. He dupes his own soldiers as well as the entire naval fleet of “Redland.” Later on, a rogue sailor who averted American capture ambushes and shoots his devious captain. Ramius survives the wound, though. He advises agent Jack Ryan to be careful what he shoots at and then relies on the American to retire the assassin for his act of vengeful patriotism. Ryan succeeds, of course, but shortly afterward, the Red October is targeted by a Russian sub. No matter. As he tends with grit to the bothersome bullet-hole in his side, the captain advices his newfound allies of the bold steering techniques required to evade the torpedo-fire of the Konovalov. Another success! The underwater jukes and swoops work so thoroughly that the Russian sub haplessly falls prey to its own torpedo.

While skillfully constructed and engaging, certain aspects of The Hunt for Red October make it seem as though it was adapted to film by the scriptwriting team of Hulk Hogan and the ghost of senator Joe McCarthy. At times, the movie disgraces Russians almost as badly as Birth of a Nation defames African-Americans, but that only serves to emphasize another facet of Connery's survival skills. In Red October, he endures because he chooses to be an American. Connery showcases that such an unnatural patriot of Planet Apple Pie must muster the courage to draw scourges of TRAITOR in order to honor our causes of freedom, capitalism, jingoistic bluster, and granting casinos to those whose ancestors we butchered. He is not a patriot in the truest sense; rather, he is better than a true patriot. In addition to love, Connery transcends loyalty to survive.

###

I never got around to watching much of Highlander, but from what I gather, Sean Connery plays the part of a warrior known as an “Immortal” who is destined to slay others of his own ilk—by decapitation, the only way to truly snuff out those pesky Immortals—until Immortaltown is whittled down to a population of one more than zero. The victor of this fantastical and nerd-approved Super Bowl of eternal warriors is granted omnipotent power over mankind.

At some point, something called “The Quickening” factors into the plot and dialog. The Quickening is a telekinetic state of mental acuity that is even sadder to mention when conversing with women than references of Yoda's Force or Peter Parker's Spider Sense.

But never mind that. In the interest of conciseness, I just want you to know that Sean Connery once played the part of a mythically gifted warrior who never let a sword-plunge through his heart ruin his day.


###

In the third installment of the Indiana Jones trilogy (never you mind the fourth of the bunch), Connery plays the title character's father, Dr. Henry Jones. He instilled in his iconic son a passion for archeology. Father and son differ in ass-kicking prowess; Sr. slyly squirts ink into a Nazi henchman's eyes to gain the upper hand, whereas his son favors a deadly mastery of whips, firearms, fisticuffs, and flag-pole jousting on a motorcycle. (And it's telling that a bewildered Jones Sr. is seated in the side-car throughout the thrilling motorcycle chase.) In a role that is antithetical to the brutal efficiency of Bond, Connery showcases his range (and vulnerability) in The Last Crusade.

We relearn that Sean Connery is vulnerable to gun shots to the stomach. The film's climax takes place in the Canyon of the Crescent Moon,* where a hidden temple was long ago carved into the steep walls of rock. Inside this temple, the Joneses and their two noble pals encounter Nazi scum. Both parties seek the preferred cup of Jesus Christ: the Holy Grail.

Owing to enduring tales of its miraculous healing power, the Holy Grail is kind of a big deal. Of the rival groups questing for the Grail, one believes it belongs in a museum, while the other craves an eternity of tyranny run amok—and it should come as no surprise that the group of Nazis champions the latter cause.

The leader of this evil troop is a man named Donovan. After every one of the lackeys he commands one-by-one to retrieve the Grail is beheaded on the first of three challenges—level 1= The Breath of God, which only the penitent man will pass—Donovan coaxes the fit and resourceful Indy into the cobwebbed and booby-trapped tunnel. He does so by busting a cap in Sr.'s gut. Indy is then forced to risk death for the Grail in order to save his dad.

If you guessed that Indiana Jones succeeded in returning the Holy Grail to his gravely wounded father, you are correct. But before that happens, he kneels (as a sign of penitence) at the right moment to dodge the ambush of a blade sprung at throat-level, then nearly plunges to his death when he forgets that Jehovah begins with an “I” in Latin. Indy recovers and scolds himself, conjures enough faith to walk across thin air, and watches on as that Nazi rube Donovan chugs from a poorly chosen cup and falls victim to a supernaturally heinous fatality that must have inspired the creators Mortal Kombat.

Enfeebled, bloodied, and lying supine, Connery as Jones Sr. sips from the Christ-astic cup offered by his son. Sacred water is poured on his gunshot wound. He grimaces as the lump of newly healed flesh flattens like a bulbous hill leveled out by the compassionate tears of God Almighty. Jones Sr. stands to his feet and buttons his shirt, awestruck and revived.

Even when Connery teeters on the cusp of death, one should never brainstorm phrases for his obituary until a year or so after his burial. He can survive by means of divine miracles, too, because God can't bare to see him die, either.

###


It would be inaccurate to claim that Sean Connery never dies in movies. Aside from the film I'm about to discuss, he dies in at least one of his lesser works, too. That doesn't defy my intent, though, because I have no illusions that the man is immortal in a genuine sense; nobody is. The Grim Reaper is undefeated--and when he notches his win over me, I want the scene to replicate in as many ways as possible Connery's death scene in The Untouchables.

To clarify: I don't want to bid an orgasmic farewell to this life in the throes of bedroom passion. I'm not so naïve to forget that it takes two, you know, and a double-homicide love-making session hardly seems romantic. And if my girlfriend or wife's pulse outlasted me in bed, I'd hate to instill in her a lifetime of recurring nightmares. No self-respecting 80-year-old man would inflict that sort of ghastly drama on his 22-year old girlfriend.

(No death during sex fantasy for me. Sex is supposed to be about the opposite of death.)

I don't want the screen to go black and read “Game Over” while playing the video games I like so damn much, either, nor keel over once the final guitar note from “Yellow Ledbetter” trails past the horizon and slowly vanishes at the conclusion of a Pearl Jam encore. Sure, those are also fairly ideal scenarios in which to parish, but they're tame and gutless compared to the demise of James Malone, the wizened and feisty patrolman turned treasury officer in The Untouchables.

The Prohibition era, which lasted from 1920 until 1933, made criminals of beer and booze drinkers, but because most people didn't mind bending a law that rebukes freedom of choice in the name of absurd puritanism, the masses drank nonetheless--albeit illegally. A moral dilemma arose, however, once it became evident that murderous bootleggers helped to facilitate the availability of liquor—especially in major cities like Chicago, where Al Capone reigned as a criminal tycoon.

In The Untouchables, Kevin Costner as Eliot Ness is chosen by the Treasury Department to exact justice on Robert DeNiro as Al Capone for corrupting the moral fiber and police department of Chicago. The hero's efforts are embarrassing and fruitless until--in a chance encounter--he meets Sean Connery as James Malone.

At first, Malone declines Ness' recruitment efforts, but he regains his dormant gumption when he remembers that “The Lord hates a coward.” In no time, he takes Ness to church and preaches a pithy endorsement of “The Chicago Way”—a method of crime-fighting that entails pulling a gun when enemies pull a knife and sending the bad guys to the morgue after they send a good guy to the hospital.

Two others join the ranks of the Untouchables—a bespectacled accountant who is shockingly deadly with a shotgun and a cool Italian-American marksman—and the quartet successfully raids numerous dealings of Capone-controlled liquor. In response to this pesky yet strengthening thorn in his criminal underbelly, Capone orders hits on the Untouchables. The Rick Moranis-lookalike is the first victim, but never mind that, for minutes later, Sean Connery performs perhaps the most gripping and bad-ass death scene in the history of cinema.

As he awaits a return-call from Ness, Malone strolls tensely around his apartment. He is eager to inform his boss of a helpful tidbit he gained by pummeling an elderly cop: the identity of Capone's bookkeeper—the man who keeps track of the gangster's shady dealings. With his attention seemingly focused on winding a phonograph, Malone has his back turned when a knife-wielding assassin creeps into his place and sneaks up on him with a malicious grin.

Malone is merely playing possum. Before the goon can strike, Malone whirls around and unleashes on his rude intruder a short-barreled shotgun; he insults the homeland of the “dago bastard,” reprises an adage of “The Chicago Way,” and chases him out the back door.

Henchmen seldom carry out solo-missions, though, and so once Malone steps outside, another villain--one hiding in the alleyway—pierces dozens of holes through his torso with an onslaught of Tommy-gun fire that blares and devastates for about ten seconds.

And yes, Sean Connery does eventually meet his cinematic demise, but prior to that, he crawls the distance of an astoundingly long hallway back to the telephone beside his phonograph. He coughs wretchedly and bleeds helplessly, and when a distraught Ness at last arrives, Connery's character does not seek religious rites or a kind farewell from a friend. Instead, he hisses a raspy revelation--the name of Capone's bookkeeper. With his final surge of willpower, as a crimson geyser oozes from his mouth, Connery jolts upward from his soon-to-be chalk-outline and asks Ness the following...

“Now! What are you prepared to do?

He fights and suffers so that his last words can serve as a fiery pep-talk to good men willing to challenge their nefarious counterparts. He is outraged by his fate, yet resigned to it. Life will, after all, go on without you or me or Sean Connery. We are but replaceable characters in an ongoing saga.

Yet every character has a part in the story we were born into but destined never to see completed. Connery's greatest roles testify that we should fight the acceptance of mortality with all the tactics available in our survival handbook until the time comes to concede that no character means more than the cause he fought for.

Here endeth the lesson.

* Note to self: Conduct a search for the Holy Grail. Begin by locating the Canyon of the Crescent Moon on Google Earth.